The Good, Bad and Ugly
Since
I can’t provide each one of you with a $50 gas card to ease the pain during
these dog days of summer, I’m going to do the next best thing and give you
three columns for the price of one.
Hootie Hoo! Consider
it my economic stimulus package.
Here’s the good. Our esteemed columnist, Jeff Dearduff,
received a silver award for best regular contributed column in the
Midwest-South region from the American Society of Business Publications Editors
(ASBPE).
We
nominated Jeff because his monthly “Engineering Management” articles take
everyday situations and provide practical solutions in a creative way that only
he can do.
Specifically,
Jeff received the award for his columns on “Gotcha! Catch the Elusive Breakdown
Bandit” in March last year and “Audit Is as Audit Does,” which ran last August.
“Gotcha!” talked about how to track intermittent breakdowns that never seem to
happen when the maintenance guy is around. “Audit” discussed how life in the
bakery is like a box of chocolates and how you never know what you’re going to
get.
Imagine that.
Comparing the auditing process to Forrest Gump.
Jeff
began writing for us about two years ago because he felt no one was addressing
the daily issues and problems that engineers face. Trust me. It’s not easy
writing a column month after month, but Jeff has been up to the task. Now he
joins the exclusive club where he can add “award-winning columnist” to his
resume.
Congratulations, Jeff!
Okay, here’s the bad,
and it’s the economy, stupid, as Uncle Bill liked to say. Maybe it’s just me,
but when Ben Bernanke and the feds finally acknowledged that they were worried
about inflation risks, I thought, “What took these idiots so long?”
Most companies in the
snack and baking industries have been dealing with rising costs for at least
five years. It’s only been during the past 18 months that it has accelerated so
much that they have had to aggressively pass on these costs to consumers in the
form of price increases.
Actually,
it’s likely worse than the feds think. We have to worry about not only
inflation, which was recently the highest in more than a quarter of a century,
but also stagflation or the double-whammy of a slowing economy and rising
prices. The housing crisis isn’t going away. Companies aren’t giving raises, or
they’re giving less than in the past. As a result, consumer confidence is in
the dumps. America’s favorite pastime has become whining about how gas prices
are putting a pinch on discretionary income.
And, yes, they’re
complaining about food prices going through the roof. Look for consumers to
begin trading down, if they haven’t already. At best, look for people to become
much more selective on where they splurge.
Starbucks, anyone?
Finally, here’s the
ugly and it doesn’t come any uglier than the return of the Atkins diet by the
Harvard School of Public Health in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Briefly, the study indicated that subjects on a low-carb diet enjoyed greater
weight-loss success than those on a Mediterranean or low-fat one.
A
spokesperson for the Atkins Foundation called it a “vindication.” Others may
call it “suspect” since the study was paid for by, you guessed it, the Atkins
Foundation.
Actually, what the
researchers don’t note is that reports on the Atkins diet tend to raise the
blood pressure of the head of another foundation, namely Judi Adams, president
of the Grain Foods Foundation.
In an e-mail to
members of the baking industry (that surprisingly contained no ALL-CAPS), Adams
noted that numerous medical experts quoted in the Wall Street Journal
and other media outlets expressed opposing points of view and addressed flaws
in the actual research.
“In particular,” she
wrote, “the subjects who followed the low-fat diet actually decreased their
carbohydrate consumption more than their consumption of fat – not a true
low-fat diet.”
To
me, the Atkins diet is a lot like the movie, “Friday the 13th.”
Every time you think you’ve seen the last one, there’s Jason on the
screen showing his ugly mask again.
The good thing is that
the sequels are never as scary as the first one.
By Dan Malovany,
editor
malovanyd@bnpmedia.com